community background

Content Creators

Content Creators
FUN INC's avatar

100% a good thing - not disclosing that you are being paid to advertise something - this is all about transparency. If you are a consumer and you use a product and like it and rave about it, you are raving about it because of the experience. If you are being paid to do that and rave about it, you need to be 100% transparent about it or you will mislead people.

Boomer's avatar

I completely agree that transparency is good and should be expected.

To play devil's advocate, I wonder what this will do to smaller creators just starting to get the chance for paid advertising? Will the fear of getting it wrong put them off, particularly as most won't be able to afford legal advice, or will clear and consistent guidance be provided by the government?

I'm all for transparency, but I'd hate for poor communication by the government to be the reason smaller creators aren't able to develop sustainable finances.

FUN INC's avatar

This is where the curated articles from JA could come in really useful! :P - got your first advertising slot... here are the do's and don'ts ! - how to be transparent about "endorsements" whilst still repping the company appropriately! and so on. This could be a really good resource for new content creators to avoid falling foul of national laws etc because of ignorance.

Lanah Tyra's avatar

Totally agree with all the above! Being an influencer is a job like any other, it needs rules as well. Clear communication is a must and there will definitely be some confusion, but isn't there one always when something new comes out? JA articles would be amazing source of information, and also it can provide new content opportunity for creators to make guides.

But there's also responsibility on the companies who want creators to advertise their products, they will need to give clear instructions as well, so it's not just on the government.

Boomer's avatar

That's a fair point! I don't recall the article mentioning sanctions against the brand, only the influencer / creator. If they wanted to crush this it would be a two-way fine, with a far bigger one for the brands as they're more likely to have legal counsel and experience with brand deals.

FUN INC's avatar

100% on this! - i started writing about it being a 2 way street in my initial reply but stopped as for larger companies that would not be too arduous to setup / set in motion, but by contrast for smaller more niche brands that could end up being a minefield. That said, i do believe that the brands wanting repping need to make sure they cover their due diligence if they are looking for promotion!

emoji

Join the conversation!

Some of the best conversations on the internet are happening here - and our users are getting rewarded for having them. Don't miss out!

sunglasses emojiemoji pointing left

Communities

There’s more to love

Help shape the future of our platform as we build the best place to express and enjoy your passions, whatever they may be.

Emoji

© Just About Community Ltd. 2025